Newsletter -
subscribe now

Powys Green Guide

Powys Green Guide Responses

Questions for Senedd Election Candidates

Powys Action on the Climate Emergency (PACE), on behalf of its network of community groups across Powys, has asked candidates seeking election to the Senedd to respond to key questions on climate, nature, energy, transport, land use and water quality.

Candidate responses received

Jeremy Davies Gwlad candidate for Gwynedd Maldwyn

Response received from Jeremy Davies, Gwlad candidate for Gwynedd Maldwyn.

1. Wind farms

Last year, the UK paid £1.5 billion to curtail wind generation, and that figure could rise to as much as £8 billion by 2030. While wind power has an important role to play in Wales, I believe we must stop the industrialisation of our countryside by large corporate operators who are exploiting current subsidies and damaging our landscapes and biodiversity with giant turbines and their huge concrete bases.

A new subsea network could be laid from Connah’s Quay to Wylfa and then down to Pembroke to strengthen our national grid infrastructure. Floating wind farms should be located offshore, where they have less impact on the environment and where the energy produced can be used for the benefit of Wales. The associated marine engineering and maintenance work would provide a welcome boost to the Welsh economy.

Gwlad does not oppose small community wind projects, or turbines needed on farms, but these must receive proper planning permission to ensure they are fair to local communities and sensitive to landscape, biodiversity, and heritage.

Wherever there are large industrial wind farms, transmission pylons will also be required. Unfortunately, the cost of undergrounding them will rarely be justified, given the expense and geological difficulties involved. Decisions about the National Grid are controlled in Westminster, and the Senedd has no direct say. If people do not want pylons, then they must say ‘NO’ to large-scale onshore wind farms.

As for where electricity for the whole UK should come from, the answer should be a balanced mix of offshore wind, tidal power, solar on roof tops and new nuclear SMRs, which are recognised by many green parties in Europe as a sustainable way forward.

2. Localising energy

Yes, communities should absolutely have a stake in local energy generation and infrastructure. They should not simply be asked for their consent after decisions have effectively been made but partners from the start.

If a community decides to host a local energy project, then that community should benefit directly from them, not just absorb the impacts.

That should mean clearer community ownership models, shared revenue, reduced local energy costs, and a requirement that a significant share of contracts, maintenance, and jobs are kept local where possible. I would also like to see planning and licensing rules that make it easier for town and community councils, cooperatives, and local trusts to invest in or co-own projects.

3. Rural transport

We need public support for rural transport infrastructure, better planning so that people are not forced to travel long distances for basic services, and policies that help rural households reduce fuel costs without losing freedom.

In Powys, the car will remain necessary for many people, but that does not mean we should accept the current lack of alternatives.

Rural transport needs a practical, affordable solution and a good first step would be to make sure bus and train services are properly co-ordinated so that people can actually rely on them.

We need to improve rail connections between north and south Wales, and there are already ideas on our website showing how this could be done by focusing on a route that links the more populated towns in Powys.

Just like the Puffin in Pembrokeshire and the Sherpa routes in Eryri, we want more rural public transport that works for local people as well as visitors, so they can leave the car behind and explore more easily.

Our tourist tax of £2 per adult over 18, per night, would be ring-fenced for transport improvements. Visitors staying three nights or more would also receive a free local transport voucher.

4. Support for local green businesses

If we want young people to stay in Wales, we need real career opportunities, not just seasonal or low-paid work. There are opportunities but we should not be misled by the large corporations. For every £1 spent in a local coffee shop 80p stays locally. For every £1 spent in a chain store 80p leaves the area.

We would support stronger procurement rules so that public bodies buy more from local firms and farms where possible, particularly for food, maintenance, construction, care, and sustainability projects. We would also like to see targeted support for small and medium-sized businesses that create decent local jobs, especially for young people. That includes business advice, starter grants, premises support, and easier access to finance.

Online shopping is not going away, but local businesses can still compete if the playing field is fair. We should encourage local branding, local food networks and stronger “buy local” campaigns. ‘Keep the money circulating in Wales’.

5. Land use

Our view is that the first principle must be that agricultural land should prioritised for food production. Alongside that, poor land, marginal land, and land with low productivity may be considered for biodiversity recovery, habitat creation and tree planting where appropriate. Land use should be based on suitability, not on blanket targets.

We would like to see more support for farmers with improved consultation to create a proper framework for Wales to replace the existing SFS scheme. That framework should protect farming as a productive economic activity while also recognising that nature recovery is essential.

We also wish to add a short note on a practical farming issue that illustrates the tension between environmental regulations and disease control – one that affects many Powys farmers.

Farmers Caught Between TB regulations and Slurry Rules

Here’s the double bind in simple terms:

  1. Bovine TB makes slurry dangerous as the bacteria can survive in cow dung and slurry for up to six months. Official advice: store it that long before spreading, to kill the bugs and protect herds/wildlife.
  2. Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZ) rules force a tight calendar. NVZs ban spreading mid-October to mid-January, therefore farms must empty stores in just 4-6 weeks beforehand – or face £2,000 fines.

The clash? Chaos.

  • Store 6 months for TB safety? Tanks overflow in wet weather.
  • Spread for NVZ compliance? Risk spreading live TB.
  • One rainy week = emergency spreading of risky slurry, disease outbreaks, nitrate runoff, and stress.

Farmers call it "farming by calendar" – rigid dates creating more problems.

Gwlad recommends more flexible rules. Let farmers spread when weather AND disease risk allow, not Brussels-style dates. This protects rivers, herds, and farmers – practical environmentalism, not ideology.

I hope this example shows Gwlad's commitment to real-world solutions for Powys farmers facing climate, nature, and economic pressures.

6. Water quality

There is a great deal of concern about the condition of our rivers, bathing waters and the effect pollution is having on our ecosystems.

We receive more rainfall in Wales than many parts of the UK and therefore the strongest argument is public safety:

Spill counts alone do not tell people whether the water is dangerous, because pathogens are what create the immediate health risk. So the policy goal should be not just “how much spilled,” but “what contamination is present, how quickly it can be measured, and how the public is warned.” That makes it easier to justify investment in infrastructure, testing facilities and a legal duty to disclose danger levels.

We need better monitoring, greater transparency, and more reporting so that people can see what is happening in their local rivers.

Welsh Water must sample storm overflow discharges at designated high-risk sites after every spill, or within a fixed period after spill events and must commission testing laboratories or accredited testing capacity for pathogens and relevant indicator organisms to be identified quickly.

Natural Resources Wales must publish risk categories or public advisories where results exceed defined thresholds and priority must be given to bathing waters, estuaries, rivers with high recreation use, and locations near vulnerable users.

To maintain improvement, we need a joined-up approach: better sewage infrastructure and, as mentioned previously on land use, an improved system to manage slurry and nutrient runoff. This is not just about nature, but about swimming, fishing, tourism, and the quality of life of communities across Wales.

Aled Davies Welsh Conservatives – Gwynedd Maldwyn

Short response received from Aled Davies.

Thank you for your email. As a County Councillor for Llanrhaeadr ym Mochnant and Llansilin, I am very aware of the challenges we face.

I would be happy to discuss these issues further at a later time. For now, I would refer you to the Welsh Conservatives’ manifesto, which is available online.

Diolch

PACE links together communities from Ystradgynlais to Llanrhaeadr, helping them collaborate in taking positive action for nature and the climate, and supporting the delivery of climate and nature solutions in their communities.

Our communities and supporters are interested to hear about the policies parties seeking election to the Senedd will seek to adopt in relation to climate and nature, to assist them in deciding who to vote for.

Instead of holding live hustings, we have compiled six important topics and are sending them to each Powys Senedd candidate for their response. We will collate and circulate the responses to our members and to the wider public.

1. Wind farms

According to UK government figures, onshore wind turbines are the cheapest form of electricity generation when comparing their lifetime cost.

Wind turbines and pylons are a challenging issue for Mid Wales. To tackle the climate emergency we urgently need more low carbon power, but we also need to protect our landscape, biodiversity and heritage. We recognise this is a difficult balance.

  • What is your view on the role of wind turbines in Mid Wales? Where do you think our electricity for the whole UK should come from?
  • How should Mid Wales be recompensed if more turbines and pylons are to be built here, especially as they are often in otherwise unspoilt locations? How could this be ameliorated?
  • How much of a premium could or should UK homes and businesses be expected to pay to receive electricity from other sources?
2. Localising energy
  • Do you think communities should have a stake in their local energy generation infrastructure?
  • What policies would you like to see implemented to better connect communities to the infrastructure they host?
3. Rural transport

Powys is one of the most sparsely populated counties in the UK. It can be a significant challenge for residents to get to work, to have a choice of workplace, to access services, and to generally live their lives.

We are heavily reliant on private cars and use them for large distances. Public transport is expensive to operate, and as a result, services are infrequent or non-existent in many communities.

  • What is your solution to enable our residents to travel and cut their carbon footprint, and for the cost of travel to remain affordable — not just the privilege of those who can afford electric cars?
4. Support for local green businesses

Many of the solutions to the climate and nature emergencies involve more of our goods and services being produced and supplied locally. For instance, to reduce our exposure to food insecurity, more food could be produced, grown and supplied locally.

To keep a vibrant local economy, there needs to be support to grow businesses that can offer rewarding and sustainable local employment, particularly for young people, and help keep them from moving out of the county.

  • How will you propose to support and encourage local sustainable businesses when society is becoming more dependent on online markets, and as a result more of our residents' money is being spent out of county?
5. Land use

Land use is becoming an increasingly important issue. The multiple challenges of food production, biodiversity protection, energy production, carbon sequestration and amenity services such as tourism are all dependent on land.

  • What policies will you forward to ensure that our land in Powys and Wales delivers all of the above services?
6. Water quality

The water quality of our rivers has been seriously degraded. Some of our most beloved rivers are polluted to the extent that there is no aquatic life left in them, and they are dangerous for people and pets to swim in.

  • How do you propose to clean and restore our waterways in Wales now, and how would you propose to maintain that improvement for nature, for people, and for future generations?

Responses to these questions will be appreciated. We know that many of these issues are not easy to address, and hope candidates will consider the impact of the strategies they support on nature, the current population, and future generations.

 

DONATE  

The Powys Green Guide has received funding from the Mid Wales Community Energy Trust to cover website support and maintenance in Montgomeryshire

This project is part-funded by the UK Government through the UK Community Renewal Fund
Mae’r prosiect hwn ei ariannu’n rhannol gan Lywodraeth y DU trwy Gronfa Adfywio Cymunedol y DU

 

© 2023- Powys Green Guide
Managed by *Seren Web